How do we write today after years of criticizing the limiting and controlling powers of logos? How have poststructuralism and Derridean deconstructive investigations been expanded into new intellectual and artistic territories? Have we or are we ever going to arrive at the futures that Jacques Derrida has written about? Can we think, write and act affirmatively, beyond the negative movement – the ”neither-nor” – upon which even Derrida was dependent?
The conference will address these and similar questions, and we welcome proposals that discuss whether thinking, writing, and creative forms or practices (with or without deconstruction’s help) have or have not succeeded in giving us theories, novels, poems, dramas, films or art that make use of logos without making use of the violence that has been a constitutive part of it.
Writing: What are the possibilities and characteristics of writing today? How is feminine writing possible today? Can we speak of a masculine writing (that is removed from phallogocentrism)? How would such writing differ from logocentric or phallogocentric writing?
Dichotomies: How do we negotiate and express, today, the binary pairs (speech/writing, male/female, black/white, nature/culture, centre/margin etc.) that have shaped and governed our world views? How do these dichotomies and their inherent connection to logos influence, infuriate, or complicate our intellectual/creative practices after the surge of Derridean criticism?
The impossible: How do we make possible and (re)present the impossible that writers like Maurice Blanchot, Hélène Cixous, and Derrida have placed in a beyond? How does this making possible and present take place without turning such a making into a ground, an origin, an arche? How is the singular given to us today without the strictures of identity?
Aesthetic and ethical values: It is important to discuss whether beauty and/or morality are achieved today and, if so, how. How does the affirmation of beauty or goodness inform thinking and creativity?